Highlights

  • 1

    The importance of characterizing breast cancers.

  • 2

    Review of the new AJCC staging procedure for non-metastatic breast cancers.

  • 3

    Discussion and questions raised by the ASCO/CAP definition of ER positivity.

  • 4

    What are the changes in new ASCO/CAP guidelines and how will they impact clinical practice?

Summary

The importance of characterizing breast cancers.

The new AJCC staging procedure for non-metastatic breast cancers reflects:

• The importance of clinical and pathological staging.

• The predictive and prognostic value of ER and HER2 positivity.

• The prognostic impact of molecular signatures.

Important questions:

• What is the appropriate definition of ER positive breast cancer?

• What is the appropriate definition of HER2 positive breast cancer?

• Is Oncotype Dx® the only useful signature?

Based on the ASCO/CAP definition of ER positivity many questions are addressed:

• Do very low and low positive ER+ breast cancers share the same prognosis?

• Do very low and low positive ER+ benefit in the same ways from the adjuvant tamoxifen?

• Is the cut-off for positive of 10% used in some European countries more relevant regarding the adjuvant endocrine treatment effect?

• Can we do better with BCI?

What are the changes in new ASCO/CAP guidelines and how will they impact clinical practice?

This event is sponsored by: :

Interviewer

Interviewee

User

Joseph Gligorov MD., PhD.

Professor of Medical Oncology
at Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie APHP.6, Sorbonne University

Paris, France

Professor Gligorov works in the oncology unit at Tenon Hospital, in Paris. He is also a member of the Scientific Board of APREC, ...

Comments (0)