Congress programs
ASCO 2019: What Impact on my Breast Cancer Clinical Practice?
June 2019
Highlights
- 1
The importance of characterizing breast cancers.
- 2
Review of the new AJCC staging procedure for non-metastatic breast cancers.
- 3
Discussion and questions raised by the ASCO/CAP definition of ER positivity.
- 4
What are the changes in new ASCO/CAP guidelines and how will they impact clinical practice?
Summary
The importance of characterizing breast cancers.
The new AJCC staging procedure for non-metastatic breast cancers reflects:
• The importance of clinical and pathological staging.
• The predictive and prognostic value of ER and HER2 positivity.
• The prognostic impact of molecular signatures.
Important questions:
• What is the appropriate definition of ER positive breast cancer?
• What is the appropriate definition of HER2 positive breast cancer?
• Is Oncotype Dx® the only useful signature?
Based on the ASCO/CAP definition of ER positivity many questions are addressed:
• Do very low and low positive ER+ breast cancers share the same prognosis?
• Do very low and low positive ER+ benefit in the same ways from the adjuvant tamoxifen?
• Is the cut-off for positive of 10% used in some European countries more relevant regarding the adjuvant endocrine treatment effect?
• Can we do better with BCI?
What are the changes in new ASCO/CAP guidelines and how will they impact clinical practice?
This event is sponsored by: :
Interviewee
Comments (0)